Giving new meaning to stimulus American Taxpayers paid $1.5 million for erectile dysfunction of overweight middle aged men studies. Stimulus money was given to the University of California San Francisco to study erectile dysfunction of overweight middle aged men and the accurate reporting of someone's sexual history.

Their Country Called 
Words and Music written by Todd Lincoln Richards
© 2011 Todd Lincoln Richards

Verse 1

He worked hard

To make the grade

He was all set up for college

After graduation day

He got to thinkin

A man should stand up tall

Is there more that I can do

To be of service to us all

Chorus

His country called

Said can you make the sacrifice

To carry this flag of freedom

You might risk your life

His country called

Said aim high, be all you can be

We are few and we are proud

Were a worldwide family

God bless us all

His country called

Verse 2

She worked hard

To raise her family

There was something missin

It felt like dignity

She got to thinkin

This world is such a scary place

I can show my children

How to help the human race

Chorus (2nd)

Her country called

Said can you make the sacrifice

To carry this flag of freedom

You might risk your life

Her country called

Said aim high, be all you can be

We are few and we are proud

Were a worldwide family

God bless us all

Her country called

Bridge

Now I walk around this town

And Im free to speak my mind

I pursue what makes me happy

Pray to whatever God I find

Every now and then

It still catches my eye

That little tattoo on the arm

Simply says Semper Fi

Verse 3

There is a place

On the last Monday in May

The Boy Scouts come together

They put a flag on every grave

Wheelchairs and Purple Hearts

Theres no way we can repay

When you look out on that field

You know exactly what they gave

Yesterday the Washington Post was happy to trot out a 45 year old story going back to GOP Candidate Mitt Romney's high school years. First they want their readers to understand that it wasn't just any high school, but rather an expensive boarding school. The story is that Romney objected to a classmate's long hair and helped a bunch of other boys cut it. In case that's not enough, the story infers that Romney didn't like the boy because supposedly Romney thought he was a homosexual.

If you went to high school 40 to 50 years ago you probably understand already that high school kids didn't think about others being homosexuals in those days. These were the years of Father Knows Best and Leave It to Beaver. Couples didn't even sleep in the same bed on TV. With that, you begin to smell a rat in the whole story.

A careful read of the story, noted by the Daily Caller shows further cracks in the story as the Post quotes a "friend" of Romney who did not witness the event and only learned about it third hand in the last year say the incident had bothered him for a long time.

"I always enjoyed his pranks, said Stu White, a popular friend of Romney's who went on to a career as a public school teacher and has long been bothered by the Lauber incident."

How can one be long bothered about something they never heard of before last year?

Barack Hussein Obama openly admits in his book, Dreams of My Father, that he smoked pot and took drugs during high school. I understand some of this behavior continued into Obama's college years. Yet the Washington Post has failed to run a story about Obama's drug use. They also have failed to run any story of his young adult associations with terrorist Bill Ayers who Obama tries to pass off as just some guy that lived on his block.

You have to ask how a "newspaper" can claim that name and call its writers "journalists" when they are willing to print untruths, half truths and innuendos but only if the person they write about is a Republican or conservative.

UPDATE:
Washington Post silently "corrects" part of story found to be lie.

That's right, ABC News broke into programming moments ago to announce that Barack Hussein Owebama supports same sex marriage.

Pardon me, but I just can't remember a media outlet breaking into programming before to announce a presidential candidate's position on any issue.

Wonder how the economy is doing these days..........

This is very long, but certainly worth an entire listen. A Russian immigrant gives an Occupier a bit of a history lesson. As others have noted, it's fantastic that the Occupier actually sticks around and listens.

Illegals are now using the IRS to cash in big by using the Additional Child Tax Credit. Using A 9-digit ITIN number provided to both legal and illegal entrants to the USA, illegals are claiming dependents, many of whom are nieces and nephews and not even living in the USA.

Each spring, at tax preparation offices all across the nation, many illegal immigrants are now eagerly filing tax returns to take advantage of a tax loophole, using their ITIN numbers to get huge refunds from the IRS.

The loophole is called the Additional Child Tax Credit. It's a fully-refundable credit of up to $1000 per child, and it's meant to help working families who have children living at home.

But many undocumented workers are claiming the tax credit for kids who live in Mexico - lots of kids in Mexico.

"We've seen sometimes 10 or 12 dependents, most times nieces and nephews, on these tax forms," the whistleblower said. "The more you put on there, the more you get back."

What a country!

First there was an objection to "illegal alien" to describe those who cross the US border and stay in the USA. So, over time, they became "illegals". Now Monica Novoa, who once admitted her family crossed illegal into CA through a torn fence, tells Bill O'Reilly that "illegals" is a racist word, therefore should be dropped.

Racist seems to be an easy word to throw around these days. We aren't choosing to call all Latinos "illegals", only those people (Latinos and other nationalities)that cross our borders illegally. What word would Ms. Novoa like for us to use? "Undocumented workers" is more incorrect than "illegal" since not all illegals are workers.

No, the contributors did nothing against the law. No, they aren't the same Mickey Mouse, Adolf Hitler and Donald Duck contributors that were documented as online donors to Barack Hussein Owebama's campaign in 2008. Romeny's donors were simply well to do American citizens who chose to donate money to Romney's campaign.

For that, the President of the USA, calls them out and suggests that they were "on the wrong side of the law", have "less-than-reputable records," and profit at the expense of Americans. (Of course when discussing expense to Americans, no mention was made of Michelle Obama's vacation to Spain that cost US taxpayers about $470,000).

These men are private citizens choosing to donate to the Romney campaign. For that they receive national attention, intimidation and are attacked even though they are not criminals and have no pending criminal or civil charges. From the office that controls the IRS, SEC, Justice Department, EPA and all sorts of other agencies that investigate private citizens comes a national intimidation campaign simply for donating to the man who challenges the office holder!

Owebama pandered to a group of students yesterday, saying that he was just quoting a GOP Congresswoman.

She said she had 'very little tolerance for people who tell me they graduate with debt because theres no reason for that.' I'm just quoting here, Im just quoting.

She said students who rack up student loan debt are just 'sitting on their butts having opportunity dumped in your lap.' I'm reading it here. So I didnt make this up.

What Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) really said was:

"I have very little tolerance for people who tell me that they graduate with $200,000 of debt or even $80,000 of debt because theres no reason for that, Foxx continued. We live in an opportunity society and people are forgetting that. I remind folks all the time that the Declaration of Independence says 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.' You dont sit on your butt and have it dumped in your lap."

Note that Foxx is saying one can get a less expensive education and doesn't have to rack up $80,000 to $200,000 if they make less expensive choices and perhaps also choose to work and save during their education.

But Owebama has to read a misquote to make Foxx look bad instead of recognizing her point.

The other point is that indeed some Americans get the idea that they've been promised an easy life on the backs of others instead of understanding that the US Constitution merely provides that every individual has the right to pursue happiness, but it comes with a cost.

Final note to Owebama: Just because you read something someone wrote for you on a piece of paper doesn't mean you are actually quoting a third person.