Katablog, a political kat
Home  Admin Login
Saturday, 18 October 2014
Why Obama is Responsible for the America Ebola Outbreak
Barack Hussein Obama and his mouth pieces are telling Americans that an outbreak of Ebola in the USA is very unlikely. However, while he was doing this, Obama was not reporting on a report he received before September 2, 2014 (the actual release date of the report)predicting that there was a 25% chance Ebola break out on American shores.

Now some of Obama's henchmen claim a mass hysteria over the Ebola outbreak. No, it's not a mass hysteria over the outbreak - it's a mass outcry that the Director of the CDC doesn't know what he's spouting off, that Obama refuses any type of quarantine for those entering the USA from infected countries, that Obama is more concerned for the economy of West Africa than the people he was elected to serve, that our borders are as porous as a sieve and that Obama turns around and appoints and Ebola Czar with absolutely no medical experience who will report to Susan Rice, who also has not medical experience but is very experienced in bold face lying to the American people on behalf of Obama.

Even four star general, General John Kelly predicts that our greatest threat comes from the porous southern border that Obama refuses to do anything about. From July to September of this year, over 50,000 women, children and teenage thugs crossed the US southern border. What did Obama do? He shipped them to cities all across the country. Then a mysterious outbreak of enterovirus broke out in cities across the country, hospitalizing thousands of children and even causing the death of some. From IBD:
691 people in 46 states and the District of Columbia had come down with some sort of respiratory illness caused by EV-D68. Five children, including Eli, died from their infections.
Do note the CDC can't make up its mind as to how this very dangerous EV-D68, which has caused paralysis in some patients got into the US. In September the CDC admitted that the virus probably came to the US through these border crossing children. In October, when Americans are up in arms over Ebola and screaming to close the borders and have some sort of quarantine for those entering the US, the CDC denies the enterovirus came from those illegally crossing our borders. But then the CDC has not been forthcoming or even correct about Ebola, so who believes anything they say at this point?

Had Obama implemented strict protocols for allowing foreigners to enter the USA and even quarantined those who were arriving from countries where there has been an Ebola outbreak, the US could have prevented the exposure to Americans. The second nurse to come down with Ebola after treating Thomas Duncan exposed an entire plane full of people when the CDC told her it was okay to fly with a slight fever. Another medical worker was cleared to go on a cruise, possibly exposing another 4,000 people to Ebola. And while the CDC likes to pretend it knows how the disease is spread, it's quite clear that they do not since at least 2 nurses following protocol were infected. Of course the CDC likes to pretend that this is the nurses fault, suggesting there was some break in protocol - while the truth is that the protocol set up was too lax and the protection provided to these medical professionals was insufficient protection.
Posted By P.Brown at 10:41 AM in Category:Health Control
Wednesday, 15 October 2014
What the CDC Doesn't Know About Ebola
Last week the CDC was assuring people that Ebola required close contact with bodily fluids to be infectious. Health care workers were suppose to be well protected with infectious disease protocols. Now two health care workers who treated an Ebola patient have Ebola. One flew on an airline the day before diagnosed. Only today is the CDC finally admitting they could (should?) have done more to protect these workers and the public.

As Glenn Beck says, this is criminally incompetence.
Posted By P.Brown at 3:02 PM in Category:Health Control
Monday, 13 October 2014
ObamaCare INCREASED USA Health Care Costs
Of course we don't have to tell you since if you are working and HAD health care coverage, you already know. For individuals purchasing their own health care, both deductibles and the cost of health care insurance have risen, in more than a few cases, dramatically! And while the Obama administration touts the number of people who didn't have insurance who now do, they don't bother to explain all those who had insurance and now don't.

Want some facts? All the answers are not yet known, but here is what we do know:
While the average annual deductible for employer-based coverage was a little over $1,000, the exchange deductibles nationwide normally topped $2,000.

Notwithstanding President Obamas specific promise to lower the typical family premium cost by $2,500 annually, premium costs actually increased.

The law reduced competition in most health-insurance markets.

Between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014, there was a net increase in individual coverage of 2,236,942, but there was a net decrease in group (employment-based) enrollment: it fell by 1,716,540. Enrollment in Medicaid and the Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP) increased by about 5 million over that same period.
So much for a government take over of health care. Oh, and there's another surprise coming down the line! Obama promised to pay any loses by insurance companies with taxpayer money.
Posted By P.Brown at 11:36 AM in Category:Health Control
Thursday, 2 October 2014
Why I Won't Vote for Pat Roberts
For days and days now I've been having discussion on Facebook with those that make the argument that conservatives must vote for Pat Roberts otherwise they are casting a vote for Harry Reid. The GOP often makes that argument and republicans are told to just hold their nose and vote when they have objections to the candidate shoved at them.

I, for one, am sick and tired of holding my nose and voting. I've come to realize that Republican or Democrat makes no difference in Washington DC if that person has no scruples. Many politicians these days vote for where the money will come from rather than what they promised their constituents they would do.

So today the argument was that I should believe in realpolitick. Here is my response:
realpolitick: "is politics or diplomacy based primarily on power and on practical and material factors and considerations, rather than explicit ideological notions or moral or ethical premises." And that would be great except I do have moral and ethical beliefs that outweigh voting for someone who doesn't. I DO want morality and ethics in my government of my country that was built on religious principles. The lack of ethics is what has these politicians going to DC and voting for themselves and their pocketbooks rather than the people they are suppose to represent. It's what has politicians trading political favors instead of representing the people paying their salaries. It's what has led to a morally corrupt government.
If we want to clean up Washington DC and all other government, we better start demanding that those elected to serve We The People actually have the moral compass that they will do so even when it means they personally will lose out on some political favor.
Posted By P.Brown at 11:38 AM in Category:Politics
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
More Troubles for ObamaCare, A Win for the States!
The US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma handed down another devastating decision in the 4 state cases against ObamaCare. This case also sides with Halbig v. Burwell and notes that the President and the IRS cannot just change the law to suite themselves.
Noting that Obama administration wants to issue Exchange subsidies in states with federal Exchanges even though the PPACA (quoting Halbig) "unambiguously restricts the [Exchange] subsidy to insurance purchased on Exchanges 'established by the State,'" Judge White argues that the government's interpretation (quoting the Tenth Circuit in Sundance Assocs., Inc., v. Reno) "leads us down a path toward Alice's Wonderland, where up is down and down is up, and words mean anything." As evidence, White quotes the concurring opinion in King: "'[E]stablished by the State' indeed means established by the state - except when it does not[.]"
I encourage you read the entire article.
Posted By P.Brown at 12:29 PM in Category:Health Control
Monday, 29 September 2014
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Obamacare
I ran into a reference today regarding Halbig v. Burwell in regards to ObamaCare and ended up searching for more information about the lawsuit against the IRS. Fortunately for me, I stumbled on to a real find. Someone at Forbes has done all the work to lead anyone to any and all information they could ever want to know about ObamaCare.

Halbig v. Burwell and 2 other cases challenge how the IRS can write its own rule to tax businesses and individuals in states that failed to set up a state exchange for purchasing ObamaCare. The original law clearly states that the only way to receive an ObamaCare subsidy is to purchase your policy on a state exchange. It would appear that at the time, Congress thought this would force states to set up ObamaCare exchanges. However, 36 states called their bluff since the states felt they were being set up for non-reimbursed costs of Medicaid in future years. Enter a problem for the IRS. If ObamaCare is a tax, how does one "tax" a business for employees that purchase ObamaCare insurance on the FEDERAL exchange since the law only provides for that "tax" for purchases from a state exchange?

The answer has turned out to be like the rest of the ObamaCare law, when they run into a road block, Obama simply declares a new law without any approval of congress. Somehow, so far, the US Congress has not challenged these illegal acts.
Posted By P.Brown at 1:48 PM in Category:Health Control
Friday, 19 September 2014
What Death Panels?
When ObamaCare first hit the scene many who read the screwy chart put out could see that a panel, chosen by the US government, would determine who was too expensive and too old to treat. Of course liberals laughed and said it wasn't true. Now we hear from the largest architect of ObamaCare, non other than Rahm Emanuel's brother, Ezekiel Emanuel.
Doubtless, death is a loss. It deprives us of experiences and milestones, of time spent with our spouse and children. In short, it deprives us of all the things we value.

But here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived. It robs us of our creativity and ability to contribute to work, society, the world. It transforms how people experience us, relate to us, and, most important, remember us. We are no longer remembered as vibrant and engaged but as feeble, ineffectual, even pathetic.
I guess with that sort of reasoning we can know "understand" why liberals don't have a problem with killing babies in utero. After all, babies are a burden, they are not very creative and they have little to contribute at that young age.

What liberals and Emanuel miss, is that THIS is God's plan. There is a time be to productive and give and then there is a time to enjoy all about you and let others give.

Now that you know Ezekiel Emanuel's prospective on old age, you might want to go back and visit the ObamaCare chart again and then kiss Grandpa goodbye.
Posted By P.Brown at 11:45 AM in Category:Health Control
Thursday, 11 September 2014
Remembering September 11, 2001
"The planes were hijacked, the buildings fell, and thousands of lives were lost nearly a thousand miles from here.

But the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were an attack on the heart of America. And standing here in the heartland of America, we say in one voice, We will not give in to terrorists; We will not rest until they are found and defeated; We will win this struggle, not for glory, nor wealth, nor power, but for justice, for freedom, and for peace; So help us God."

--Tom Harkin, Iowa Senator
Posted By P.Brown at 1:30 PM in Category:Profound
Friday, 5 September 2014
More Benghazi Truth
Finally those with knowledge speak about what happened 2 years ago in Benghazi while Obama busied himself with preparing for yet another campaign stop and apparently Hillary Clinton twiddled her thumbs. Kris Paronto, Mark Geist, and John Tiegen were Special Ops commandos working for the USA CIA in Benghazi providing security for the embassy there.

Speaking with Fox News.
Word of the attack on the diplomatic compound reached the CIA annex just after 9:30 p.m. Within five minutes, the security team at the annex was geared up for battle, and ready to move to the compound, a mile away.

"Five minutes, we're ready," said Paronto, a former Army Ranger. "It was thumbs up, thumbs up, we're ready to go."

But the team was held back. According to the security operators, they were delayed from responding to the attack by the top CIA officer in Benghazi, whom they refer to only as "Bob."

"It had probably been 15 minutes I think, and & I just said, 'Hey, you know, we gotta-- we need to get over there, we're losing the initiative," said Tiegen. And Bob just looks straight at me and said, Stand down, you need to wait.'"

"We're starting to get calls from the State Department guys saying, 'Hey, we're taking fire, we need you guys here, we need help,'" said Paronto.

After a delay of nearly 30 minutes, the security team headed to the besieged consulate without orders. They asked their CIA superiors to call for armed air support, which never came.

Now, looking back, the security team said they believed that if they had not been delayed for nearly half an hour, or if the air support had come, things might have turned out differently.
More information as of September 6, 2014
Posted By P.Brown at 7:03 PM in Category:Politics
Wednesday, 3 September 2014
Incompetent or Treasonous?
One of Obama's former classmates and previous Libertarian VP candidate, Wayne Allyn Root, discussed Obama's actions recently on The Capitol Hill Show. He had this to say:
"Here's a guy who, no matter what happens to him, he's always playing golf. If a black kid gets shot, Obama's playing golf. If a war's started in Ukraine with our greatest rival,Russia , Obama's playing golf. If a two-star general, the ranking general to be shot and killed in battle shighest-ince the Vietnam War 50 years ago, and his body's being brought home, where's Obama? Playing golf.... Someone should be calling the man out& Either we have a president of the United States who just doesn't care about the country, or we have a president who's purposefully fiddling while Rome burns who wants bad things to happen because he's not out to help the country, he's out to take the country down."
No one could be THAT incompetent. Incompetent people actually accidentally do the right thing from time to time.

What is really puzzling is the actions of a do nothing congress. In this sense they are doing nothing about a president consistently breaking the law and not upholding his prescribed duties outlined in the US Constitution. It may be understandable (though totally wrong) that Obama's own party members do nothing; but where is the rest of Congress? Even Democrats should be inflamed that one man, elected to serve the USA is undermining and destroying our country.
Posted By P.Brown at 12:02 PM in Category:Politics
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Kansas Protest Slide Show
Kansas Tea Party 03/07/2009
9/12 March on Washington DC
2010 Kansas Tax Day TEAparty

Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Search
Bookmarks
Syndicate This Site
Blog Flux Directory
Add to Technorati Favorites
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Copyright 2006-2011
Brown Holdings LLC,
All rights reserved.